引用本文: 来幸樑，师尚礼，吴芳，郝梓暄，周彤，陈建纲，赵亚东. 紫花苜蓿与3种多年生禾草混播草地的土壤养分特征. 草业科学, 2020, 37(1): 52-64. doi: shu

Citation: LAI X L, SHI S L, WU F, HAO Z X, ZHOU T, CHEN J G, ZHAO Y D. Nutrient characteristics of soil sowed with different combinations of alfalfa and three perennial grasses. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(1): 52-64. doi: shu

紫花苜蓿与3种多年生禾草混播草地的土壤养分特征

.
gansunongyedaxuecaoyexueyuan，gansu lanzhou 730070

作者简介: 来幸樑(1990-)，女，甘肃景泰人，在读硕士生，主要从事牧草种质资源与育种研究。E-mail: ;

通讯作者: 师尚礼,

摘要: 为了探究紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)与不同禾草混播草地的土壤养分分布与积累规律，将紫花苜蓿与无芒雀麦(Bromus inermis)、草地早熟禾(Poa pratensis)、苇状羊茅(Festuca arundinacea)均分别按1∶2、1∶1和2∶1比例进行同行混播，研究混播组合和混播比例对0 – 20 cm和20 – 40 cm土层土壤养分特征的影响。结果表明，1)较苜蓿单播，紫花苜蓿与3种多年生禾草混播对浅层(0 – 20 cm)土壤有机质、速效钾、碱解氮、速效磷、全磷的积累有显著的促进作用(P < 0.05)。2) 3种混播组合中，紫花苜蓿 + 无芒雀麦改善土壤肥力的效果优于其他两种混播组合。0 – 40 cm土层紫花苜蓿 + 无芒雀麦更有利于土壤有机质、氮素、磷素养分的积累，而紫花苜蓿 + 草地早熟禾混播对于钾素的积累效果更明显。3)混播比例的变化对浅层的速效磷、全磷，深层土壤有机质、碱解氮影响显著(P < 0.05)，增加苜蓿的比例，土壤养分含量增加。3种混播比例中，0 – 20 cm 土层紫花苜蓿 + 无芒雀麦配比处理1∶1和20 – 40 cm土层紫花苜蓿 + 无芒雀麦配比处理2∶1较其他两个比例混播更有利于速效养分的积累；0 – 20 cm和20 – 40 cm土层紫花苜蓿 + 草地早熟禾配比处理1∶2土壤速效钾、全钾含量最高，2∶1土壤碱解氮、全氮、全磷含量最高，而紫花苜蓿 + 苇状羊茅配比处理2∶1土壤有机质、全氮、全磷、全钾和速效养分含量均高于其他两个比例混播。4)空间分布上，随着土层加深，除草地早熟禾单播和紫花苜蓿 + 苇状羊茅配比处理土壤全钾出现深层高于浅层现象外，其余所有混播处理土壤养分含量均为浅层高于深层，呈现养分表聚性现象。

关键词:

English

Nutrient characteristics of soil sowed with different combinations of alfalfa and three perennial grasses

重庆欢乐生肖 pratacultural college, gansu agricultural university, lanzhou 730070, gansu, china

Corresponding author: Shangli SHI,

Received Date: 2018-03-11
Available Online: 2019-01-01

Abstract: We evaluated the nutrient characteristics of soil sowed with different combinations of alfalfa and three grasses, namely, Bromus inermis, bluegrass, and tall fescues at ratios of 1∶1, 1∶2, and 2∶1. The effects of different combinations and ratios on soil nutrients in the 0 – 20 cm and 20 – 40 cm soil layers were evaluated. The results revealed the following. 1) The combination of alfalfa and three perennial grasses can significantly promote the accumulation of soil organic matter, available potassium, soil hydrolysis nitrogen, soil available phosphorus, and total phosphorus (P < 0.05). 2) Alfalfa + B. inermis was better than the other two combinations in improving soil fertility. The combination of alfalfa + B. inermis was more conducive to the accumulation of soil organic matter, nitrogen, and phosphorus nutrients in the 0 – 40 cm soil layer, whereas the effect of alfalfa + bluegrass in improving potassium accumulation was more obvious. 3) The ratio of alfalfa and the grasses had a significant effect on available phosphorus, total phosphorus, deep soil organic matter, and hydrolysis nitrogen in the shallow soil layer (P < 0.05). The soil nutrient content increased with an increase in alfalfa proportion. Among the three ratios, the 1∶1 ratio of alfalfa + B. inermis in the 0 – 20 cm soil layer and the 2∶1 ratio of alfalfa + B. inermis in the 20 – 40 cm soil layer were more conducive to the accumulation of available nutrients. In the 0 – 20 and 20 – 40 cm soil layers sowed with alfalfa + bluegrass at a ratio of 1∶2, soil available potassium and total potassium content was the highest, and at the ratio of 2∶1, the content of soil available nitrogen, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus was the highest. The content of organic matter, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, total potassium, and available nutrients in the 0 – 20 and 20 – 40 cm layers of soil sowed with alfalfa and reed fescue at 2∶1 ratio was higher than that at the other two ratios. 4) In terms of spatial distribution, except for single sowing of bluegrass and combination alfalfa + tall fescue, under all other combinations, the shallow soil nutrient content was higher than that in deep soil, showing a phenomenon of nutrient surface cohesion.

Key words:

1. [1]
  祁军, 郑伟, 张鲜花, 唐高溶, 王祥, 朱进忠. 不同豆禾混播模式的草地生产性能[J]. 草业科学草业科学, 2016, 33(1): 116-128. doi:
  QI J, ZHENG W, ZHANG X H, TANG G R, WANG X, ZHU J Z. Determination and comparison of the production performance of pastures among different spatial structure of Legume-grass mixtures[J]. Pratacultural SciencePratacultural Science, 2016, 33(1): 116-128. doi:
2. [2]
  伍翼鑫, 赵奇. 优质牧草混播技术[J]. 新疆农业科技新疆农业科技, 2016, (4): 53-54. doi:
  WU Y X, ZHAO Q. Mixture technology of high quality forage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016, (4): 53-54. doi:
3. [3]
  周鹏. “牧草之王”: 紫花苜蓿[J]. 新疆畜牧业新疆畜牧业, 2013, (7): 56-. doi:
  ZHOU P. King of pasture: Alfalfa[J]. Xinjiang Animal HusbandryXinjiang Animal Husbandry, 2013, (7): 56-. doi:
4. [4]
  陈宝书. 牧草饲料作物栽培. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2015: 308-312.
  CHEN B S. Forage Crop Cultivation. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2015: 308-312.
5. [5]
  孙吉雄. 草坪学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2015: 74-75.
  SUN J X. Turf Science. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2015: 74-75.
6. [6]
  张学洲, 李学森, 兰吉勇, 张荟荟, 陈强, 范天文. 豆科与禾本科牧草混播组合筛选试验研究[J]. 草食家畜草食家畜, 2012, (2): 41-45. doi:
  ZHANG X Z, LI X X, LAN J Y, ZHANG H H, CHEN Q, FAN T W. The screening tests of legume and grass mixed sowing combination[J]. Grass-Feeding LivestockGrass-Feeding Livestock, 2012, (2): 41-45. doi:
7. [7]
  吴姝菊. 紫花苜蓿与无芒雀麦、扁穗冰草混播效果研究[J]. 中国草地学报中国草地学报, 2010, 32(2): 15-18, 46.
  WU S J. Effect of mixed seeding alfalfa with smooth bromegrass and crested wheat grass[J]. Chinese Journal of GrasslandChinese Journal of Grassland, 2010, 32(2): 15-18, 46.
8. [8]
  韩永芬, 覃涛英, 付薇, 苏生, 陈伟, 马培杰. 紫花苜蓿与扁穗雀麦、鸭茅混播效果研究[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学畜牧与饲料科学, 2018, 39(6): 62-66. doi:
  HAN Y F, QIN T Y, FU W, SU S, CHEN W, MA P J. Effect of mixed seeding of Medicago sativa with Bromus catharticus and Dactylis glomerata[J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed ScienceAnimal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2018, 39(6): 62-66. doi:
9. [9]
  谢开云, 赵云, 李向林, 何峰, 万里强, 王丹, 韩冬梅. 豆-禾混播草地种间关系研究进展[J]. 草业学报草业学报, 2013, 33(3): 284-296. doi:
  XIE Y K, ZHAO Y, LI X L, HE F, WAN L Q, WANG D, HAN D M. Relationships between grasses and legumes in mixed grassland: A review[J]. Acta Prataculturae SinicaActa Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 33(3): 284-296. doi:
10. [10]
  韩志顺, 郑敏娜, 梁秀芝, 康佳惠, 陈燕妮. 旱区苜蓿混播技术研究进展[J]. 农业科技通讯农业科技通讯, 2018, (8): 215-217. doi:
  HAN Z S, ZHENG M N, LIANG X Z, KANG J H, CHEN Y N. Research progress on mixtures technology of alfalfa in arid areas[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, (8): 215-217. doi:
11. [11]
  张永亮, 范富, 高凯, 冯静, 苏娜. 苜蓿、无芒雀麦单播与混播对土壤有机质和速效养分的影响[J]. 草地学报草地学报, 2009, 17(1): 22-26. doi:
  ZHANG Y L, FAN F, GAO K, FENG J, SU N. Effects of Medicago varia Martin, Bromus inermis Leyss, and mixture of the both on soil organic matter of the both on soil organic matter and available nutrients[J]. Acta Agrestia SinicaActa Agrestia Sinica, 2009, 17(1): 22-26. doi:
12. [12]
  朱亚琼, 关正翾, 郑伟, 王祥. 混播种类和群体结构对豆禾牧草混播系统氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 草业学报草业学报, 2018, 27(10): 1-14.
  ZHU Y Q, GUAN Z X, ZHENG W, WANG X. Effects of species diversity and community structure on nitrogen use efficiency of mixed legume+grass pastures[J]. Acta Prataculturae SinicaActa Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(10): 1-14.
13. [13]
  张德, 龙会英, 金杰, 樊博, 赵秀梅, 韩学琴. 豆科与禾本科牧草间作的生长互作效应及对氮、磷养分吸收的影响[J]. 草业学报草业学报, 2018, 27(10): 15-22.
  ZHANG D, LONG H Y, JIN J, FAN B, ZHAO X M, HAN X Q. Effects of growth interaction effect of Leguminous and Gramineous pasture intercropping and absorption of nutrient and phosphorus on pasture expression[J]. Acta Prataculturae SinicaActa Prataculturae Sinica重庆欢乐生肖, 2018, 27(10): 15-22.
14. [14]
  BESCHOW H, SCHULZE J, MERBACH W. Transfer of symbiotically fixed nitrogen in an alfalfa-grass mixture studied through isotope dilution in a pot experiment[J]. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies, 2000, 36(1): 21-33. doi:
15. [15]
  SCHIPANSKI M E, DRINKWATER L E. Nitrogen fixation in annual and perennial legume-grass mixtures across a fertility gradient[J]. Plant and SoilPlant and Soil, 2012, 357(1-2): 147-159. doi:
16. [16]
  姜慧敏. 豆科牧草与禾本科牧草的根系特征与生理生态指标的比较研究. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古大学硕士学位论文, 2013.
  JIANG H M. A comparative study of forage legumes and grasses root characteristics and physiological indexes. Master Thesis. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University, 2013.
17. [17]
  鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 第三版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 100-150.
  BAO S T. Soil Agrochemical Analysis. 3th ed. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2000: 100-150.
18. [18]
  郑伟, 加娜尔古丽, 唐高溶, 朱进忠. 混播种类与混播比例对豆禾混播草地浅层土壤养分的影响[J]. 草业科学草业科学, 2015, 32(3): 329-339.
  ZHENG W, Jianaerguli, TANG G R, ZHU J Z. Effect mixed species mixed ratios of legume to grass on soil nutrients in surface soils of legume-grass mixture pasture[J]. Pratacultural SciencePratacultural Science, 2015, 32(3): 329-339.
19. [19]
  张晓红, 徐炳成, 李凤民. 黄土塬区三种豆科牧草的土壤养分剖面分布特征与平衡[J]. 中国生态农业学报中国生态农业学报, 2008, (4): 810-817.
  ZHANG X H, XU B C, LI F M. Nutrient equilibrium and distribution along soil profile of three legumes on highland Loess Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-AgricultureChinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture重庆欢乐生肖, 2008, (4): 810-817.
20. [20]
  蔺芳, 刘晓静, 张家洋. 人工草地种植模式对沙化土壤团聚体及有机质含量的影响[J]. 中国沙漠中国沙漠, 2018, 38(6): 1219-1229.
  LIN F, LIU X J, ZHANG J X. Effects of planting patterns on soil aggregates and organic matter characteristics of sandy soil[J]. Journal of Desert ResearchJournal of Desert Research重庆欢乐生肖, 2018, 38(6): 1219-1229.
21. [21]
  韩建国, 韩永伟, 孙铁军, 王小山. 农牧交错带退耕还草对土壤有机质和氮的影响[J]. 草业学报草业学报, 2004, (4): 21-28. doi:
  HAN J G, HAN Y W, SUN T J, WANG X S. Effects of returning cultivated land to herbage on soil organic matter and nitrogen in the agro-pastoral transitional zone of north China[J]. Acta Prataculturae SinicaActa Prataculturae Sinica, 2004, (4): 21-28. doi:
22. [22]
  徐大伟, 徐丽君, 辛晓平, 杨桂霞, 苗阳. 呼伦贝尔地区不同多年生牧草根系形态性状及分布研究[J]. 草地学报草地学报, 2017, 25(1): 55-60. doi:
  XU D W, XU l J, XIN X P, YANG G X, MIAO Y. Study on roots morphological properties and distribution of different perennial forages in Hulunber[J]. Acta Agrestia SinicaActa Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(1): 55-60. doi:
23. [23]
  杨文亭, 王晓维, 王建武. 豆科-禾本科间作系统中作物和土壤氮素相关研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志生态学杂志, 2013, 32(9): 2480-2484.
  YANG W T, WANG X W, WANG J W. Crop-and soil nitrogen in legume-Gramineae intercropping system: Research progress[J]. Chinese Journal of EcologyChinese Journal of Ecology重庆欢乐生肖, 2013, 32(9): 2480-2484.
24. [24]
  李秋祝, 余常兵, 胡汉升, 孙建好, 陈伟, 李隆. 不同竞争强度间作体系氮素利用和土壤剖面无机氮分布差异[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(4): 777-785. doi:
  LI Q Z, YU C B, HU H S, SUN J H, CHEN W, LI L. Difference of nitrogen utilization and distribution of mineral nitrogin in soil profile by competitive abilities of intercropping systems[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer SciencePlant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2010, 16(4): 777-785. doi:
25. [25]
  OLASANTAN F O. Effects of preceding maize (Zea mays) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in sole cropping and intercropping on growth, yield and nitrogen requirement of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)[J]. Journal of Agricultural ScienceJournal of Agricultural Science, 1998, 131(): 293-298. doi:
26. [26]
  JERANYAMA P, HESTERMAN O B, WADDINGTON S R, HARWOOD R R. Relay-intercropping of sunnhemp and cowpea into a smallholder maize system in Zimbabwe[J]. Agronomy JournalAgronomy Journal, 2000, 92(): 239-244. doi:
27. [27]
  邰继承, 杨恒山, 范富, 张庆国, 宋桂云, 苏雅乐. 播种方式对紫花苜蓿+无芒雀麦人工草地浅剖面土壤C、N分布及储量的影响[J]. 草业学报草业学报, 2010, 19(6): 41-45. doi:
  TAI J C, YANG H S, FAN F, ZHANG Q G, SONG G Y, SU Y L. Effects of manual sowing methods of Medicago sativa and Bromus inermis on the distribution and content of soil organic carbon and nitrogen[J]. Acta Prataculturae SinicaActa Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(6): 41-45. doi:
28. [28]
  潘多锋, 申忠宝, 王建丽, 高超, 李道明, 张瑞博, 邸桂俐, 钟鹏. 紫花苜蓿与无芒雀麦混播对松嫩平原盐碱化草地土壤改良效果研究[J]. 黑龙江农业科学黑龙江农业科学, 2012, (10): 127-131. doi:
  PAN D F, SHEN Z B, WANG J L, GAO C, LI D M, ZHANG R B, DI G L, ZHONG P. Study on soil improvement effect of alfalfa mixed with smooth brome grass on saline-alkaline grassland in Songnen plain[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural SciencesHeilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2012, (10): 127-131. doi:
29. [29]
  肖焱波, 李隆, 张福锁. 豆科/禾本科间作系统中氮营养研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报中国农业科技导报, 2003, (6): 44-49. doi:
  XIAO Y B, LI L, ZHANG F S. An outlook of the complementary nitrogen nutrition in the legume//graminaceae system[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2003, (6): 44-49. doi:
30. [30]
  曾迪, 漆智平, 周丹, 魏志远, 王登峰, 高乐, 刘磊. 海南儋州农用地土壤速效磷和速效钾的空间变异[J]. 热带生物学报热带生物学报, 2018, (1): 54-60.
  ZENG D, QI Z P, ZHOU D, WEI Z Y, WANG D F, GAO L, LIU L. Spatial variability of soil available phosphorus and soil available potassium contents in agricultural land in Danzhou, Hainan Province[J]. Journal of South China University of Tropical Agriculture, 2018, (1): 54-60.
31. [31]
  陈晶, 王峰, 谢应忠, 王俊杰, 汤阳, 许冬梅. 沙芦草+胡枝子混播草地的生物量及土壤速效养分[J]. 草业科学草业科学, 2015, 32(4): 492-500. doi:
  CHEN J, WANG F, XIE Y Z, WANG J J, TANG Y, XU D M. Biomass and avaiable soil nutrient of Afropyron mongolicun + Lespedeza davurica pasture[J]. Pratacultural SciencePratacultural Science, 2015, 32(4): 492-500. doi:
32. [32]
  张皓, 何腾兵, 林昌虎, 何冠谛, 高安勤. 不同种植方式黔产半夏土壤养分分析[J]. 江苏农业科学江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(6): 226-230.
  ZHANG H, HE T B, LIN C H, HE G D, GAO A Q. Analysis on soil nutrients in pinellia fields under different planting patterns in Guizhou Province[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural SciencesJiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(6): 226-230.
33. [33]
  崔莹. 燕麦和箭筈豌豆混播对人工草地生产性能及土壤性质的影响. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学硕士学位论文, 2014.
  重庆欢乐生肖 CUI Y. Effect on production performance and soil properties of artificial grassland mixed sowing oats and common vetch. Master Thesis. Lanzhou: Gansu Agriculture University, 2014.
34. [34]
  ZHANG F S, LI L. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency[J]. Plant and SoilPlant and Soil, 2003, 248(): 305-312. doi:
35. [35]
  曹仲华. 西藏农区箭筈豌豆与一年生禾草混种效应的研究. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文, 2007.
  CAO Z H. Study on the effect of common vetch-annual gramineous forage mixture agriculture areain Tibet. Master Thesis. Yangling: Northwest Agriculture & Forestry University, 2007.
36. [36]
  渠佳慧. 燕麦与箭筈豌豆不同行比例间作对饲草产质量及土壤性状的影响. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学硕士学位论文, 2017.
  重庆欢乐生肖 QU J H. Effects of intercopping oat and commen vetic on forage yield and quality and soil characteristic. Master Thesis. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2017.
37. [37]
  王筝, 鲁剑巍, 张文君, 李小坤. 田间土壤钾素有效性影响因素及其评估[J]. 土壤土壤, 2012, 44(6): 898-904. doi:
  WANG Z, LU J W, ZHANG W J, LI X K. Influential factors on soil available potassium evaluation in agriculture[J]. SoilsSoils, 2012, 44(6): 898-904. doi:
38. [38]
  单索薇. 钾肥对农作物品质影响的浅析[J]. 农业与技术农业与技术, 2003, (6): 88-89. doi:
  SHAN S W. Analysis on the effect of potassium fertilizer on crops quality[J]. Agriculture and TechnologyAgriculture and Technology, 2003, (6): 88-89. doi:
39. [39]
  韩永伟, 韩建国, 王堃, 张蕴薇, 康俊梅. 农牧交错带退耕还草对耕作层土壤磷、钾含量的影响[J]. 草地学报草地学报, 2003, 11(3): 228-233.
  HAN Y W, HAN J G, WANG K, ZHANG Y W, KANG J M. Soil content of phosphorus and potassium in the agro-pastoral transitional zone after cropland being transformed into grassland[J]. Acta Agrestia SinicaActa Agrestia Sinica, 2003, 11(3): 228-233.
40. [40]
  张仁平, 于磊, 鲁为华, 蒋慧. 混播草地地上生物量与土壤主要养分变化的关系研究[J]. 新疆农业科学新疆农业科学, 2009, 46(3): 592-596.
  ZHANG R P, YU L, LU W H, JIANG H. Study on the relationship between ground biomass and soil nutrient in the mixed grassland[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural SciencesXinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 46(3): 592-596.
1. [1]
  阿芸 , 师尚礼 , 张晓燕 , 张翠梅 , 李文 , 吴芳 , 周彤 , 来幸樑 , 陈永岗 , 孙守江 . 5龄紫花苜蓿轮作草地早熟禾的土壤养分变化特征. 草业科学, 2019, 36(11): 2863-2870. doi:
2. [2]
  赵如梦 , 张炳学 , 王晓霞 , 韩凤朋 . 黄土高原不同种植年限苜蓿草地土壤与植物化学计量特征. 草业科学, 2019, 36(5): 1189-1199. doi:
3. [3]
  阿芸 , 师尚礼 , 李文 , 孟涛涛 , 邵建雄 . 紫花苜蓿与草地早熟禾轮作序列土壤氮素时空动态变化差异. 草业科学, 2019, 36(2): 304-313. doi:
4. [4]
  卢建男 , 张琼 , 刘铁军 , 贾儒康 , 郭辉 , 刘金荣 . 不同改良剂对盐碱地土壤及草地早熟禾生长的影响. 草业科学, 2017, 11(6): 1141-1148. doi:
5. [5]
  申晓慧 , 姜成 , 李如来 , 李建东 , 张华 , 郑海燕 , 郭伟 , 孙力 , 冯鹏 . 3种紫花苜蓿与草地羊茅单、混播越冬期根系生理变化及抗寒性. 草业科学, 2016, 10(2): 268-275. doi: 重庆欢乐生肖
6. [6]
  罗凤敏 , 雷虹娟 , 汪季 , 王静 , 高亮 , 高君亮 , 党晓宏 . 水肥调控对无芒雀麦品质的影响. 草业科学, 2014, 8(11): 2135-2140. doi:
7. [7]
  赵天赐 , 安婵 , 李金升 , 乔建霞 , 唐士明 , 罗红霞 , 白鹭 , 邵新庆 , 王堃 , 刘克思 . 不同退化程度草地土壤碳、氮对人工湖的时空响应. 草业科学, 2019, 36(1): 61-68. doi:
8. [8]
  胡培雷 , 曾昭霞 , 王克林 , 宋希娟 , 李莎莎 . 喀斯特地区不同年限桂牧1号象草草地土壤养分特征. 草业科学, 2016, 10(1): 1-10. doi:
9. [9]
  孙磊 , 刘玉 , 武高林 , 魏学红 . 藏北退化草地群落生物量与土壤养分的关系. 草业科学, 2016, 10(6): 1062-1069. doi:
10. [10]
  刘娜 , 白可喻 , 杨云卉 , 张睿洋 , 张睿洋 , 韩国栋 , 韩国栋 . 放牧对内蒙古荒漠草原草地植被及土壤养分的影响. 草业科学, 2018, 12(6): 1323-1331. doi:
11. [11]
  关正翾 , 娜尔克孜 , 朱亚琼 , 郑伟 , 刘岳含 , 艾丽菲热 . 不同混播方式下燕麦+箭筈豌豆混播草地的生产性能及土壤养分特征. 草业科学, 2019, 36(3): 772-784. doi:
12. [12]
  马超然 , 何树斌 , 白雪纯 , 王涛 , 张君红 , 冯魁亮 , 夏宇康 . 套种紫花苜蓿对玉米根际土壤碳、氮、磷及真菌群落的影响. 草业科学, 2020, 37(1): 20-29. doi:
13. [13]
  包乌云 , 赵萌莉 , 徐军 , 高新磊 , 赵巴音那木拉 . 苜蓿与禾本科牧草的混播效果. 草业科学, 2013, 7(11): 1782-1789.
14. [14]
  郝裕辉 , 李瑶 , 唐凤 , 张树振 , 张博 . 29份无芒雀麦种质资源农艺性状的遗传多样性. 草业科学, 2020, 37(9): 1770-1778. doi:
15. [15]
  吴芳 , 李玉珠 , 师尚礼 , 张贞明 , 高永勇 . 西北荒漠灌区覆膜条件下苜蓿草地土壤理化性质的时空变化. 草业科学, 2017, 11(4): 665-672. doi:
16. [16]
  董乙强 , 孙宗玖 , 安沙舟 , 杨静 . 禁牧对中度退化伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地土壤养分的影响. 草业科学, 2016, 10(8): 1460-1468. doi:
17. [17]
  詹天宇 , 侯阁 , 刘苗 , 孙建 , 付顺 . 青藏高原不同退化梯度高寒草地植被与土壤属性分异特征. 草业科学, 2019, 36(4): 1010-1021. doi:
18. [18]
  贾倩民 , 陈彦云 , 刘秉儒 , 陈科元 , 韩润燕 . 干旱区盐碱地不同栽培草地土壤理化性质及微生物数量. 草业科学, 2014, 8(7): 1218-1225. doi: 重庆欢乐生肖
19. [19]
  宋曦 , 王金成 , 井明博 , 刘光琇 , 陈拓 , 吴胜伟 , 周天林 . 紫花苜蓿对陇东黄土高原油污土壤场地生态修复的综合响应. 草业科学, 2019, 36(7): 1754-1764. doi:
20. [20]
  张萌萌 , 敖红 , 张景云 , 鞠成梅 , 胡举伟 ,
  李鑫 , 蔡敦江 , 孙广玉 . 建植年限对紫花苜蓿根际土壤微生物群落功能多样性的影响. 草业科学, 2014, 8(5): 787-796. doi:

重庆欢乐生肖

图 1 不同单播及混播组合土壤有机质含量

Figure 1. Soil organic matter content under different combinations of alfalfa and grasses

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 不同混播配比土壤有机质含量

Figure 2. 重庆欢乐生肖 Soil organic matter content under different ratios of alfalfa and grasses

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同单播及混播组合土壤氮素含量

Figure 3. Soil N content under different single and combination sowing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 重庆欢乐生肖不同混播配比土壤氮素含量

Figure 4. 重庆欢乐生肖 Soil N content under different combination ratios

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 重庆欢乐生肖不同单播及混播组合土壤磷素含量

Figure 5. Soil P content under monoculture and mixculture

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 不同混播配比土壤磷素含量

Figure 6. Soil P content under different combination ratios

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 重庆欢乐生肖不同单播及混播组合土壤钾素含量

Figure 7. Soil K content under single and combination sowing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 重庆欢乐生肖不同混播配比土壤钾素含量

Figure 8. Soil K content under different combination ratios

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 重庆欢乐生肖豆–禾混播方式、混播比例及播种量

Table 1. Mixed sowing ratio and sowing rate of legume–grass mixture

处理代码 Treatment code	播种方式 Sowing method	草种 Grass species	播种比例 Sowing ratio	播种量 Sowing rate/(kg·hm^–2)
处理代码 Treatment code	播种方式 Sowing method	草种 Grass species	播种比例 Sowing ratio	紫花苜蓿 Medicago sativa	禾本科 Gramineae
CK₁	单播 Monoculture	无芒雀麦 Bromus inermis	–	0	30
CK₂	单播 Monoculture	草地早熟禾 Poa pratensis	–	0	15
CK₃	单播 Monoculture	苇状羊茅 Festuca arundinacea	–	0	38
CK₄	单播 Monoculture	紫花苜蓿 Medicago sativa	–	15	0
A₁	混播 Mixture	紫花苜蓿 + 无芒雀麦 M. sativa and B. inermis (M+B)	1∶2	5	20
A₂			1∶1	7.5	15
A₃			2∶1	10	10
B₁	混播 Mixture	紫花苜蓿 + 草地早熟禾 M. sativa and P. pratensis (M+P)	1∶2	5	10
B₂			1∶1	7.5	7.5
B₃			2∶1	10	5
C₁	混播 Mixture	紫花苜蓿 + 苇状羊茅 M. sativa and F. arundinacea (M+F)	1∶2	5	25
C₂			1∶1	7.5	19
C₃			2∶1	10	12.5

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 播前土壤理化性质

Table 2. 重庆欢乐生肖 Soil physical and chemical properties before sowing

土层 Soil layer/cm	有机质 Organic matte/%	碱解氮 Hydrolysis N/(mg·kg^–1)	速效钾 Available K/(mg·kg^–1)	速效磷 Available P/(mg·kg^–1)	pH
0 – 20	0.84	48.35	94.23	8.14	8.21
20 – 40	0.66	36.34	86.94	5.32	8.36